You added every one of those products for a reason. The third colorway existed because customers kept asking for it. The bundle went live because AOV needed help. The seasonal drop, the limited run, the extended size range: each one felt like giving shoppers more of what they want.

One reasonable decision at a time, your collection page turned into a wall.

A founder I spoke to recently is sitting inside this exact maths. He spends about $28K a month across Meta and Google Shopping, and sessions are up 22% year on year. Over the same period, his catalog grew from 45 SKUs to 130. Conversion slid from 2.2% to 1.8%.

"We nearly tripled the catalog in a year. Orders are exactly where they were last July."

He's right, and the numbers check out. A 22% traffic gain multiplied by a conversion rate that fell from 2.2 to 1.8 lands at almost exactly 1.0. Flat. A year of sourcing, launching, and photographing new products, and the order count didn't move.

More choice feels like service. Give people exactly what they want, the thinking goes, and more of them will buy. Psychologists have been measuring what actually happens for seventy years, and it runs the other way.

Why Does Every Extra Option Slow The Sale Down?

In 1952, a British psychologist named William Edmund Hick measured how long people take to choose as the number of options grows. The result became Hick's Law: decision time increases logarithmically with the number and complexity of choices. There's a formula, T = a + b · log₂(n + 1), but the operator version is simpler. Every option you add makes the decision slower, and the delay compounds with how hard the options are to tell apart.

The mechanism matters more than the formula. Each new option adds another comparison the brain has to resolve before it can act. In a physical store, that delay looks like browsing. Online, hesitation has a close button.

The most famous demonstration is the jam shelf. In 2000, Columbia's Sheena Iyengar and Stanford's Mark Lepper ran a tasting booth in an upscale grocery store, alternating between 24 flavors of jam and 6. The bigger shelf drew more attention: 60% of passers-by stopped, against 40% at the small one. Buying flipped the story. Around 3% of the 24-jam crowd purchased. Nearly 30% of the 6-jam crowd did. Ten times the conversion from a quarter of the range. Jen

❝

Clinehens, who runs Choice Hacking, calls the wider pattern the Choice Overload Effect: past a threshold, added options confuse more than they serve.

One honest caveat, because researchers spent two decades stress-testing that study. A 2015 meta-analysis led by Alexander Chernev found that choice overload is real but conditional: it reliably appears when options are hard to compare, when shoppers are unsure of their own preferences, and when no default guides them. Which happens to be a fairly precise description of an unmerchandised collection page.

Where The Overload Hides On Your Store

None of this looks like a problem in the Shopify admin. In the admin it looks like a healthy, growing catalog. On the storefront, it shows up as:

  • Collection pages that pour every product into one undifferentiated grid, handing the shopper a merchandising job they never applied for.

  • Near-identical colorways listed as separate products, so shoppers bounce between three cards hunting for a difference that matters.

  • Filter drawers with fifteen checkboxes and no guidance, which most shoppers open, scan, and close without ticking anything.

  • Variant pickers with no default selected, adding one more decision between the shopper and the add-to-cart button.

  • Default sort set to newest, which buries proven bestsellers under products that haven't earned the position yet.

Notice what these have in common. None of them are motivation problems. The shopper arrived wanting something you sell. Each item on that list simply raises the number of unresolved questions between landing and add to cart. Every option is another question you're asking the shopper to answer, and past a certain count, the easiest answer is the back button.

Should You Just Cut The Catalog In Half?

When founders first meet this idea, the question they usually reach for is which products to kill. That conversation goes nowhere. Every SKU has a defender, a supplier relationship, or a small pocket of loyal buyers, and the meeting ends with the catalog intact.

The better question: how much of the choosing can you do for the shopper before they have to think? A 130-product catalog behind clear categories, a bestseller default sort, and one curated entry point reads as depth. The same 130 products in a single grid read as work. Choice is service until it becomes a tax. What flips it is rarely the product count. What flips it is how many decisions you leave on the shopper’s side of the table.

That question changes the work, too. Cutting SKUs is a fight with your own team. Designing decisions is merchandising, and it can start this week.

Run This 20-Minute Audit On Your Top Collections

Open GA4 and pull your three highest-traffic collection pages. Give each one 20 minutes. Count every distinct choice a first-time visitor faces in the first two scrolls: products, visible variants, filter options, sort options. Most founders have never taken this number, and it’s usually two or three times what they would guess.

Then make four moves. Merge near-identical colorways into a single card with swatches. Set the default sort to bestsellers, so proven products do the greeting. Add one curated row above the grid, six to eight products under a plain label like "Start here." And trim the filter set to the handful people actually use.

To see whether it’s working, open Microsoft Clarity (it’s free) and filter recordings to those three URLs. Watch for two behaviours: the filter drawer opened, scanned, and closed with nothing ticked, and the cursor bouncing between two colorways of the same product until the session ends. Both are the overload showing itself. If your collections already come up clean, run the same count on your PDP variant pickers and bundle builders. Same maths, smaller shelf.

❝

Shoppers don’t buy from the store with the most options. They buy from the store where choosing feels easy. Curate like it’s part of the product.

This Week's Free Resource

A free before-and-after infographic showing how to categorize and cap the options on a collection page. Pin it next to your merchandising calendar.

Thanks for reading!

Conal Brady
Ecom Luxx

P.S. Learn more about Ecom Luxx and our GrowthOps™ Partnership below: